1. The Ministry of Finance (MOF) launched its Budget 2008
Feedback Exercise on 15 October 2007 with the aim of gathering
views from the public on their expectations for the Budget
and subsequently their response to announcements made during
Budget 2008. The feedback channels included MOF’s online
portal, Budget dialogue sessions, and the SMS feedback channel
organised in conjunction with REACH. Over 700 feedback contributions
were received through these channels.
2. MOF would like to thank all contributors for their comments.
We have prepared a summary of feedback received along with
our responses to the main issues raised.
3. The top 4 categories of feedback raised by the public
during the pre-Budget feedback segment from 15 October 2007
to 1 February 2008 were :
4. Click here to view some of the
feedback in the top 4 categories and MOF’s response.
5. The top 4 categories of comments from the public on the
Budget 2008 statement were :
6. Click here to view some of the
feedback in the top 4 categories and MOF’s response.
|
Rising
costs and help for the lower-income group |
Feedback Raised:
Provide GST exemption for basic necessities such as
sugar and rice
MOF’s Response:
Providing GST exemption for basic necessities is not
an effective way of helping the poor. Firstly, most
of the spending of lower-income households is not on
basic necessities such as sugar and rice, but on items
such as transport, utilities, and other public services
where GST is already absorbed by the Government. Secondly,
the bulk of GST revenue from basic necessities comes
from the higher-income households and foreigners. Should
we exempt these goods, we would be providing more of
the relief to those who do not need help. Thirdly, exempting
basic necessities from GST will mean that GST on non-essentials
will have to be higher. This would impact all Singaporeans
including the lower-income households. Hence, it is
far more effective to keep a single GST rate on all
goods, and use part of the revenue collected to provide
targeted assistance to low-income families. This is
what the Government is currently doing with the GST
Offset Package.
Feedback Raised:
Provide more social transfers to help the poor cope
with rising costs
MOF’s Response:
As part of Budget 2008, the Government announced
a surplus-sharing package worth $1.8 billion for all
Singaporeans. Along with Budget 2007’s GST Offset
Package to help Singaporeans cope with the GST increase,
the Government will be giving over $3 billion to Singaporeans
this year.
The lower-income will receive the highest payouts of
Growth Dividends, GST Credits, and Senior Citizens’
Bonuses. HDB households will also get up to $200 million
in S&CC, U-Save and rental rebates. These benefits
exceed the increase in costs of living that lower-income
families face this year.
Feedback Raised:
Raise the maximum monthly income eligibility of
Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) scheme to $1,700 from
$1,500, so that not just the bottom rung of the workforce
benefit.
MOF’s Response:
The current income ceiling of $1,500 covers the
bottom 30% of the working population, which is the scheme’s
target segment. Nevertheless, the Government will review
the scheme by 2010 taking into account all public feedback.
Feedback Raised:
Increase the payout from the Public Assistance Scheme
MOF’s Response:
As announced in the Budget 2008 Statement and MCYS's
Committee of Supply, the Public Assistance rates have
been increased by amounts ranging from $40 to $165 per
month. The eligibility criteria for the Public Assistance
Scheme has also been widened to allow individuals who
are permanently unable to work and whose family members
are unable to provide adequate support to receive Public
Assistance as well.
|
|
The
tax regime |
Feedback Raised:
Remove Estate Duty (ED)
- Cost of ED administration is disproportionate to
revenue
- ED diminishes Singapore's appeal as a financial
centre
- ED exemption limits are too low, hitting the middle-class
while the rich can tax-plan away
MOF’s Response:
As part of Budget 2008, the Finance Minister removed
Estate Duty for all deaths with effect from 15 Feb 2008.
The decision was made following a comprehensive review
taking into account feedback from the public.
Feedback Raised:
Reduce personal income tax (PIT) to mitigate rising
costs of living and retain mobile talent
MOF’s Response:
Singapore's personal income tax regime is already one
of the most competitive in the world. Even when compared
to Hong Kong with its low standard PIT rate of 15%,
most individuals remain better off in Singapore as our
marginal tax rates are lower and more progressive. The
Government will continue to monitor the effective tax
burden of Singapore tax residents and ensure that Singapore
remains a compelling place to attract and keep talent,
including those at the top end.
Cutting tax rates to mitigate the rising costs of living
is however not an effective measure. This is because
two-thirds of workers in Singapore do not pay any income
tax.
Feedback Raised:
Keep the corporate tax regime competitive and simple
MOF’s Response:
Singapore's tax regime remains amongst the simplest
in the world. Taking into account corporate tax and
other taxes like GST, Singapore was rated as the second
easiest place for businesses to pay taxes in the 2008
World Bank-PricewaterhouseCoopers "Paying Taxes"
survey.
The Government will continue to ensure a competitive
tax regime to reward the success and enterprise of our
companies. It made a decisive push in Budget 2007 to
cut the headline corporate tax rate from 20% to 18%
and expand the Partial Tax Exemption regime to provide
a lower effective tax rate for small and medium enterprises.
In Budget 2008, the Government introduced tax incentives
to encourage innovation and entrepreneurship, as well
as a special allowance for fixtures and fittings which
benefit F&B and retail companies in particular.
|
|
Formal
education and lifelong learning |
Feedback Raised:
Enhance tax relief given for course fees and look into
ways to provide assistance to encourage lifelong learning
MOF’s Response:
As part of Budget 2008, the course fee tax relief was
enhanced to provide more support to individuals seeking
continual upgrading:
- For approved vocational qualifications, taxpayers
can claim the tax relief regardless of whether the
course is relevant to their current professions.
- For courses leading to an approved qualification,
the tax relief claim can be made within 2 years of
assessment from the year of assessment relating to
the year in which the courses were completed.
Feedback Raised:
Offer more bursaries and scholarships to needy students
MOF’s Response:
As part of Budget 2008, the Government has significantly
enhanced bursaries for lower-income students, and extended
support to more middle-income tertiary students.
|
|
Climate
change and sustainable development |
Feedback Raised:
Increase R&D grants, tax incentives and investments
to encourage utilisation of alternative energy sources
MOF’s Response:
The Government notes the rising public awareness on
the need for alternative energy use and sustainable
development. Indeed, it is actively supporting R&D in
renewable energy. For instance, the Government allocated
$170 million to support clean energy R&D, in particular
for solar energy and fuel cells. Additional funding
was also set aside to support test-bedding initiatives
such as the $38 million Singapore Initiative on New
Energy Technology (SINERGY) Centre, which provides a
platform for the development and test-bedding of advanced
energy solutions.
Singapore has also managed to attract large clean energy
players such as Renewable Energy Corporation's (Norway)
$6.3 billion solar manufacturing complex.
In the area of sustainable development and climate
change, two inter-ministerial committees have been set
up to review policies and chart strategies from a holistic
angle. New incentives provided in Budget 2008 include:
- A new $9 million grant that helps offset the cost
of upgrading façade features of buildings to improve
their overall energy efficiency.
- A $50 million Sustainable Energy Fund to build
competency in energy management and support energy
efficiency programmes.
Feedback Raised:
Increase incentives to encourage the use of hybrid cars
MOF’s Response:
There is currently a Green Vehicle Rebate (GVR) to incentivise
the purchase of hybrid cars. The GVR is set at 40% of
the Open Market Value (OMV) to offset the Additional
Registration Fee (ARF) of a new hybrid car. The Government
will conduct regular reviews to see if there is a need
to further promote the use of hybrid vehicles.
Feedback Raised:
Impose a CO2 emission tax
MOF’s Response:
The Government already employs the use of incentives
to mitigate carbon emissions (e.g. by improving energy
efficiency). Whilst we keep an open mind to implementing
carbon-based taxes, there is still considerable international
debate on the appropriate greenhouse gas mitigation
mechanism to adopt. Before international consensus on
the post-Kyoto protocol (which ends in 2012) climate
regime can be reached, introducing punitive measures
could increase business and living costs without achieving
the desired outcome for Singapore.
A prematurely implemented carbon emissions tax would
be particularly counterproductive for businesses if
the targeted activities can simply move to other countries
without similar carbon constraints. In such a scenario,
Singapore will end up incurring economic costs without
achieving the environmental benefit of a reduction in
global emissions.
|
|
Surplus-sharing
package |
Feedback Raised:
Growth Dividends were very welcome and Singaporeans
looked forward to receiving the payouts. Nevertheless,
some members of the public felt that the Annual Value
of homes was not the best way to determine Growth Dividend
payouts.
MOF’s Response:
We agree that the Annual Value (AV) of the place of
residence is but a proxy of an individual’s wealth
and cannot be the sole criterion to determine the payout
of Growth Dividends. As such, the Government relies
on not just the AV of an individual’s place of
residence but also his Assessable Income (AI). These
two criteria provide a fuller picture of the individual’s
financial circumstances and ensure a more targeted means
of distributing Growth Dividends to Singaporeans who
need it most.
Feedback Raised:
The personal income tax rebate was also well-received,
especially by the middle-income. Some feedback was received
however that the money spent on the rebate could have
been channeled to the Growth Dividend package to help
the lower-income.
MOF’s Response:
Budget 2008’s surplus-sharing package is for
all Singaporeans, as every citizen contributes to the
growth and success of Singapore. The income tax rebate
is to recognize the contribution of taxpayers, but it
comes with a cap so that more benefits can go towards
the middle-income groups. Nevertheless, Singaporeans
who feel that they do not need their Growth Dividends
can donate their payouts to a charity of their choice.
While the lower-income may not stand to benefit from
the tax rebate, they get the highest payout of Growth
Dividends, GST Credits and Workfare Income Supplements,
and receive the most benefits when seen as a percentage
of household income.
Feedback Raised:
There seemed to be no specific benefit for housewives
in Budget 2008.
MOF’s Response:
Housewives actually stand to receive more Growth
Dividends (up to $600) than working Singaporeans as
they fall in the Assessable Income (AI) category of
$5,000 or less. This is also the same design
in apportioning GST Credits and Senior Citizens’
Bonuses which are part of Budget 2007’s GST Offset
Package.
|
|
Innovation
incentives |
Feedback Raised:
The innovation incentives – 150% deduction, R&D
Tax Allowance and RISE scheme would encourage both small
and big businesses to engage in innovation. In particular,
RISE would help R&D-intensive start-ups with cash-flow
issues. There was however concern that not all companies,
such as those involved in traditional businesses, can
benefit from the initiatives.
MOF’s Response:
The main objective of the Budget 2008 innovation incentives
is to make innovation more pervasive by encouraging
all types of companies to invest in R&D,
not just companies in hi-tech sectors. Details of the
schemes, including what types of R&D can be covered,
are being worked out and will be released by September
2008.
|
|
Formal
education and lifelong learning |
Feedback Raised:
The enhanced bursaries and student loans were welcome,
but the increase in university tuition fees was still
a concern. Perhaps tuition fees could be tiered so that
the bottom rung of households get full subsidy while
the top end pay more than the existing subsidy rate.
MOF’s Response:
Our universities have to be able to charge realistic
fees so that they can provide a top-quality education
for students and sustain their competitive edge. The
enhanced system of bursaries announced in Budget 2008
will effectively mean that students from lower- and
middle-income households will fork out less in tuition
fees than those from higher-income households. Along
with the availability of loans, this means that Singaporeans
need not be hampered by their financial circumstances
when pursuing tertiary education.
Feedback Raised:
40% subsidy for part-time courses should be extended
to institutions beyond the 3 local universities and
UniSIM.
MOF’s Response:
The subsidy for part-time degree courses is currently
extended to the three publicly-funded universities and
UniSIM because the Government can be assured of the
quality of the programmes provided by these institutions.
Being a new scheme, the Government will review the take-up
rate and whether the subsidy could be extended to other
private institutions over time.
|
|
Rising
business costs |
Feedback Raised:
There were not enough incentives to help small businesses
with rising business costs (e.g. rising wages, rents,
and transport costs)
MOF’s Response:
There were suggestions from the public to give a corporate
tax rebate to businesses, just as how it was done in
1999, 2001 and 2002. However, it is important to note
that past corporate tax rebates were in response to
economic downturns rather than problems caused by strong
economic growth. Specifically, businesses in those years
were hit by weak demand rather than rising costs.
In contrast, the economy today is expanding. Providing
a tax rebate to businesses would not solve the imbalance
of supply and demand. Instead, it may cause costs to
rise even further. The right solution is to relieve
the bottleneck in supply-side factors, which is what
the Government has been seeking to do –
Labour: To ease market pressure, the Ministry
of Manpower has allowed more flexible access to foreign
manpower:
- The quota for mid-skilled foreign manpower (S-pass
holders) was increased from 15% to 25% in January
2008.
- The Dependency Ratios (the number of foreign workers
companies can hire for every local worker) have been
raised for the manufacturing, services, construction,
process and marine sectors in January 2008.
Office Space: To address immediate office space
constraints, the Government has released 15 transitional
office sites and vacant state properties, which will
yield 150,000 square metres of office space. The Ministry
of National Development has also been releasing land
to meet office space demand in the medium to longer
term. An estimated 1.4 million square metres of office
space is expected to be completed by 2012.
Industrial Land: Since the resumption of the
Government Land Sales programme in 2003, the Ministry
of Trade and Industry has been putting out industrial
land which will result in a significant supply coming
on stream by 2009. This will be close to twice the area
of industrial space released in the last two years,
and will ease tight occupancy rates and relieve pressure
on rents.
Construction costs: The combination of higher
raw material prices and work on major new projects such
as the two integrated resorts and petrochemical complexes
has caused construction costs to spike. To ease the
pressure, the Government has deferred some $3 billion
worth of public projects to date.
|
|