|
I note that many MPs have supported the principle of means
testing and agree that subsidies, whether for healthcare,
education, housing or other livings costs, should be targeted
according to need.
I also agree with Mr Loh Meng See, Mr Zainul Abidin and
the others that we need to proceed carefully. Mr Gan Kim Yong
has suggested that MOH adopt a multi-tiered approach, rather
than an all-or-nothing framework to determine the subsidy
level, with an appeal mechanism for deserving cases. I think
that is a workable pragmatic strategy. We have to make judgments.
We have to look at many factors. It is not just his pay, it
is not just his wealth. It is his family obligations, his
family circumstances, his needs, his outlook. A judgment has
to be made but we should avoid having a step function, where
a small difference in the judgment makes a big difference
in the subsidy which he gets. There has to be some smoothness
in what he gets.
The step-down care sector and the primary care services,
which means the community hospitals, nursing homes and home
nursing, where means-testing has been running since July 2000,
use a three-tier subsidy level. We have some experience doing
this. We will continue to accumulate experience. I assure
MPs that we will try and learn how it works in practice and
we will consult extensively before settling on the rules for
expanding means testing to other parts of the healthcare sector.
As we target our medical subsidies at those in need, we
will also need to ensure that healthcare remains affordable
for the middle income group. Our current 3M health financing
framework is quite sound - Medisave, MediShield and Medifund.
Our Medisave is actually a very important part of this scheme.
We introduced it in 1984. The amounts have been building up
gradually. On average, Singaporeans are saving more than enough
in their Medisave accounts to provide for their needs - themselves
and their families. If we look at the CPF accounts, each year,
contributions to Medisave amount to about $2.5 billion, while
withdrawals amount to only about $1 billion.
So for most Singaporeans, affordability is not a problem.
The problem arises if you are unlucky, because not everybody
has the same medical expenses. $1 billion is on average. But
if you happen to have an accident or a serious illness requiring
expensive treatment, you may be in trouble. So there is a
problem. The solution to that is to make greater use of medical
insurance, beyond MediShield, to cater for non-catastrophic
illnesses, so as to stretch the Medisave dollar. It has to
be properly designed - there must be co-payments, there must
be deductibles. But I think with risk-pooling, with Medisave,
we can make the Medisave dollar go further and we can lift
the worry which many people have, that is, just in case, they
have kidney disease or are incapacitated, who is going to
look after them and how they are going to cover this. This
is something which MOH is studying.
|
|