|
3.29 Our children embody our hopes for the future. Singapore’s
birth rate is way below replacement level and falling. This
is a serious problem. A declining birth rate will sap the
vitality and resilience of our country.
3.30 Over the years, we have introduced many measures to
encourage and support parenthood. After our first package
in 1987, the total fertility rate (TFR), which reflects the
number of children a woman is expected to have during her
lifetime, jumped up to 1.96, as seen in the chart. This was
partly because 1988 was a “Dragon” year, but the
impact of the package was felt through the first half of the
1990s. Unfortunately the effect seems to have worn off over
time, and the underlying trend of a falling TFR has reasserted
itself. By the next “Dragon” year in 2000, the
TFR had declined to 1.60. I am not sure what the next dragon
will be. It may be a lizard! The Baby Bonus scheme and further
generous tax incentives introduced in 2000 have failed to
reverse this trend. We give out over $200 million annually
in tax reliefs and rebates, and more than $100 million has
been disbursed under the Baby Bonus scheme. Yet the TFR for
2003 dropped to a historic low of 1.26. This is one of the
lowest birth rates in the world. Only 36,000 babies were born
last year, far fewer than the 50,000 babies we need to replace
ourselves.

3.31 The accelerated decline in TFR since 1998 was partly
caused by economic uncertainty – these were the years
of the Asian financial crisis and the two recessions. But
the underlying downtrend in birth rates is real and will continue
unless we take decisive steps now.
3.32 Our existing measures are not enough. We must take a
more comprehensive approach to solving this problem. We must
encourage young people to marry and marry earlier, and make
it easier for young couples to start and raise a family. And
we have to take a long-term view. The impact of our policies
on birth rates may not be felt immediately, because changing
attitudes, mindsets and practices takes time and patience.
3.33 We need to shift social attitudes towards having children,
even while we recognise that having children is a very personal
decision which couples have to make for themselves. There
is no single magic solution. The approach must be both holistic
and coherent, addressing parents’ concerns from childbirth
through the years of bringing up their children. As these
are complex issues that require thorough discussion and deliberation,
the Government will study them in depth over the next few
months, before deciding on the most effective set of measures.
Today I shall set out the principles that will guide our thinking.
3.34 Firstly, the aim of our measures must be not just to
produce more children, but to produce the next generation
of Singapore citizens. We want to grow the total population
of Singapore, but equally important, we also have to reproduce
and maintain the core group of citizens who will build and
defend our country, and without whom we would not be a nation.
Thus our measures must focus on encouraging more Singapore
citizen babies.
3.35 Secondly, the problem is more serious for the mothers
who are more educated and earn higher incomes. The higher
the woman’s career attainment, the less likely she is
to get married and the fewer children she is likely to have.
This is true not just of graduates, but also of women with
secondary education. It is understandable because the more
a woman is able to earn a living, the heavier the opportunity
cost to her of having children. Therefore while our measures
must cover all families, we must especially make sure that
the incentives are effective for the better qualified women.
3.36 Thirdly, while encouraging procreation is critical,
realistically it will be very hard to raise our TFR back to
the replacement level of 2.1. Even other countries which have
managed to reverse falling birth rates have not achieved replacement
fertility. We therefore need to boost our population through
other ways. In particular, we need to open our doors to immigrants
who can contribute to Singapore. After getting them here,
we need to help them settle down and integrate into our society.
We need the right policies to encourage them first to become
permanent residents (PRs), and then to take up citizenship.
This means treating PRs and citizens differently, so that
PRs have incentives to take up the privileges and responsibilities
of being Singaporeans.
3.37 As for specific measures to encourage procreation, a
comprehensive approach should include adequate support facilities
such as infant and child care arrangements, better balance
between work and family life, and of course financial help
measures.
3.38 To start with, we have to consider the issue of maternity
leave. We have hitherto been reluctant to increase statutory
maternity leave. But many working mothers feel that the current
two months is too short. A major worry of working mothers
is that they will have too little time with their children,
particularly in the first few months after birth which are
crucial to bonding mother and child. We may need to extend
the period of maternity leave, but without overburdening employers
with added costs.
3.39 Next, when the mother returns to work, she will often
want to put her child in affordable and reliable child care
facilities. The Government already subsidises child care,
but infant care is more expensive. We will therefore look
into providing more financial help for infant care.
3.40 Next, we need to strike a better balance between work
and family life. Many couples cite the lack of family time
and flexible working arrangements as an impediment to having
more children. As an employer, the Government will review
civil service work arrangements, without affecting essential
public services. We will set a clear example to companies
of how employers can create a work environment that is supportive
of families.
3.41 Finally, while families should not have babies just
because of financial incentives, tax reliefs and rebates for
parents and working mothers appreciably lighten the financial
burden of bringing up children. We need to simplify and enhance
the existing tax incentives, to make them more accessible
and attractive to couples. In fact, I find them quite hard
to understand too. I think my wife has figured them out.
3.42 Two civil service teams visited Europe recently to study
how other countries are tackling their falling birth rates.
One went to Italy, the Netherlands and France, and the other
to Norway and Sweden. Norway and Sweden have one model. They
are both welfare states and they have succeeded in bringing
their birth rates up. Netherlands and France have succeeded
in bringing their birth rates up. Italy has not. We wanted
to know why one worked and the other did not. We will study
the lessons drawn and come up with our own measures. As several
ministries are involved, I have tasked Mr Lim Hng Kiang, Minister
in the Prime Minister’s Office, to take charge and to
make specific proposals. He will be assisted by an inter-ministry
civil service Working Committee on Population chaired by Mr
Eddie Teo, Permanent Secretary in the Prime Minister’s
Office. I have asked the committee to complete its work before
National Day.
|