| Singapore has
enjoyed faster growth than we had thought possible
in 1986. Then, the Ministry of Trade and Industry
had projected our long-term indigenous growth
rate to be 4-6 per cent. This 4-6 per cent represented
the supply-side growth potential for the Singapore
economy in the next 30-40 years if no more new
foreign workers were allowed.
In reality, growth has averaged
8.5 per cent in the last 10 years. This is due
to two important developments, one external and
one domestic. Since the late 1970s, there has
been a wave of economic reform and liberalisation
in Asia. China's economic reform programme in
1978 led first to a boom in trade via Hong Kong
and then to an upsurge in foreign direct investments
into China. 1993 was a record year when China
saw foreign direct investment approvals reach
US$110 billion. The transformation in ASEAN was
no less dramatic. Indonesia liberalis foreign
investment in 1983, Malaysia and Thailand in 1986.
India, after years of pursuing economic self-reliance,
opened up in 1991.
The liberalisation has made the
region as a whole more attractive to foreign investors.
Furthermore, ASEAN's move to liberalise and deregulate
their economies coincided with rising cost pressures
in Japan and the NIEs and hence increased the
outflow of foreign direct investment from these
countries. Foreign direct investment into the
ASEAN countries, China and India rose dramatically,
from US$20 billion in 1988 to US$160 billion in
1995.
Exports by Asian countries (excluding
Japan) also saw dramatic growth. Between 1985
and 1995, exports grew by 17 per cent per annum,
compared with 14 per cent per annum between 1975
and 1985.
The increase in trade and investment
linkages has resulted in closer economic integration
of the Asian economies. For Singapore, regional
growth has given an added boost to the economy
and cushioned us against slower growth in the
OECD countries over the last 5 years.
Domestically, we have expanded
our supply-side growth potential due to three
factors. First, the female labour participation
rate has increased from 45 per cent in 1985 to
50 per cent in 1995. Second, the workforce has
expanded faster than we had anticipated, partly
because of higher immigration and partly because
we have allowed in more foreign workers who now
account for about 1 in 5 workers. Third, our years
of investments in education, training and infrastructure
are now paying off in higher productivity growth.
Productivity growth during 1985-95 averaged 4.7
per cent per annum, higher than the 4.0 per cent
per annum recorded in the preceding 10 years.
The better labour productivity
performance has been accompanied by a trend of
improving Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth.
Since the recovery from recession in 1986, TFP
growth has averaged 2.8 per cent per annum compared
with the -1.4 per cent during 1974-86.
MTI's projection is for growth
potential to be about 7 per cent per annum for
the next 5 years. In good years, we may do better
but with consequences like rising costs and a
tight labour market. In weaker years, growth may
fall below 7 per cent.
Because Singapore is so heavily
dependent on external demand, we must adapt to
changes in the environment. |